Search
1098 matching practices
| Number | Best Practice |
|---|---|
| 13-8-8036 | Network Operators, Service Providers should note that systems that are not compliant with the patching policy and these particular elements should be monitored on a regular basis. These exceptions should factor heavily into the organization's monitoring strategy. Vulnerability mitigation plans should be developed and implemented in lieu of the patches. If no acceptable mitigation exists, the risks should be communicated to management. |
| 13-8-8041 | Equipment Suppliers should provide filters and access lists on the header fields, for layer 3 switches/routers, with interfaces that mix user and control plane data, to protect the control plane from resource saturation by filtering out untrusted packets destined to for control plane. Measures may include: 1) Allowing the desired traffic type from the trusted sources to reach the control-data processor and discard the rest, 2) separately rate-limiting each type of traffic that is allowed to reach the control-data processor, to protect the processor from resource saturation. |
| 13-8-8042 | Network Operators and Service Providers should validate routing information to protect against global routing table disruptions. Avoid BGP peer spoofing or session hijacking by applying techniques such as: 1) eBGP hop-count (TTL) limit to end of physical peering link, 2) MD5 session signature to mitigate route update spoofing threats (keys should be changed periodically where feasible). |
| 13-8-8043 | Network Operators and Service Providers should use existing BGP filters to avoid propagating incorrect data. Options include: 1) Avoid route flapping DoS by implementing RIPE-229 to minimize the dampening risk to critical resources, 2) Stop malicious routing table growth due to de-aggregation by implementing Max-Prefix Limit on peering connections, 3) Employ ISP filters to permit customers to only advertise IP address blocks assigned to them, 4) Avoid disruption to networks that use documented special use addresses by ingress and egress filtering for "Martian" routes, 5) Avoid DoS caused by unauthorized route injection (particularly from compromised customers) by egress filtering (to peers) and ingress filtering (from customers) prefixes set to other ISPs, 6) Stop DoS from un-allocated route injection (via BGP table expansion or latent backscatter) by filtering "bogons" (packets with unauthorized routes), not running default route or creating sink holes to advertise "bogons", and 7) Employ "Murphy filter" (guarded trust and mutual suspicion) to reinforce filtering your peer should have done. |
| 13-8-8044 | Network Operators and Service Providers should conduct configuration interoperability testing during peering link set-up; Encourage Equipment Suppliers participation in interoperability testing forums and funded test-beds to discover BGP implementation bugs. |
| 13-8-8045 | Network Operators and Service Providers should protect their interior routing tables with techniques such as 1) Not allowing outsider access to internal routing protocol and filter routes imported into the interior tables 2) Implementing MD5 between IGP neighbors. |
| 13-8-8049 | Network Operators and Service Providers should employ techniques to make it difficult to send unauthorized DHCP information to customers and the DHCP servers themselves. Methods can include OS Hardening, router filters, VLAN configuration, or encrypted, authenticated tunnels. The DHCP servers themselves must be hardened, as well. Mission critical applications should be assigned static addresses to protect against DHCP-based denial of service attacks. |
| 13-8-8053 | Network Operators should establish thresholds for various SS7 message types to ensure that DoS conditions are not created. Also, alarming should be configured to monitor these types of messages to alert when DoS conditions are noted. Rigorous screening procedures can increase the difficulty of launching DDoS attacks. Care must be taken to distinguish DDoS attacks from high volumes of legitimate signaling messages. Maintain backups of signaling element data. |
| 13-8-8054 | Network Operators should have defined policies and process for addition and configuration of SS7 elements to the various tables. Process should include the following: personal verification of the request (e.g., one should not simply go forward on a faxed or emailed request without verifying that it was submitted legitimately), approval process for additions and changes to SS7 configuration tables (screening tables, call tables, trusted hosts, calling card tables, etc.) to ensure unauthorized elements are not introduced into the network. Companies should also avoid global, non-specific rules that would allow unauthorized elements to connect to the network. Screening rules should be provisioned with the greatest practical depth and finest practical granularity in order to minimize the possibility of receiving inappropriate messages. Network operators should log translation changes made to network elements and record the user login associated with each change. These practices do not mitigate against the second threat mentioned below, the insertion of inappropriate data within otherwise legitimate signaling messages. To do so requires the development of new capabilities, not available in today's network elements. |
| 13-8-8055 | Network Operators and Equipment Suppliers should support authentication service and integrity services as standards based solutions become available for VoIP CPE devices. Network Operators need to turn-on and use these services in their architectures. |
| 13-8-8056 | Network Operators should ensure that Operational Voice over IP (VoIP) Server Hardening of network servers have authentication, integrity, and authorization controls in place in order to prevent inappropriate use of the servers. Enable logging to detect inappropriate use. |
| 13-8-8057 | Equipment Suppliers should for Voice over IP (VoIP) Server Product Hardening, provide authentication, integrity, and authorization mechanisms to prevent inappropriate use of the network servers. These capabilities must apply to all levels of user, general, control, and management. |
| 13-8-8058 | Network Operators and Service Providers should prevent theft of service and anonymous use by enabling strong user authentication as per cellular/wireless standards. Employ fraud detection systems to detect subscriber calling anomalies (e.g. two subscribers using same ID or system access from a single user from widely dispersed geographic areas). In cloning situation remove the ESN to disable user thus forcing support contact with service provider. Migrate customers away from analog service if possible due to cloning risk. |
| 13-8-8060 | Network Operators and Service Providers should ensure strong separation of data traffic from management/signaling/control traffic, via firewalls. Network operators should ensure strong cellular network backbone security by employing operator authentication, encrypted network management traffic and logging of security events. Network operators should also ensure operating system hardening and up-to-date security patches are applied for all network elements, element management system and management systems. |
| 13-8-8063 | Network Operators and Service Providers should install and actively monitor IDS/IPS tools. Sensor placement should focus on resources critical to the delivery of service. |
| 13-8-8066 | Network Operators, Service Providers, and Equipment Suppliers should participate in regional and national information sharing groups such as the National Coordinating Center for Telecommunications (NCC), Telecom-ISAC, and the ISP-ISAC (when chartered). Formal membership and participation will enhance the receipt of timely threat information and will provide a forum for response and coordination. Membership will also afford access to proprietary threat and vulnerability information (under NDA) that may precede public release of similar data. |
| 13-8-8069 | Network Operators and Service Providers should identify a Point of Contact (POC) for handling requests for the installation of lawfully approved intercept devices. Once a request is reviewed and validated, the primary POC should serve to coordinate the installation of any monitoring device with the appropriate legal and technical staffs. |
| 13-8-8070 | Network Operators and Service Providers should have Abuse Policies and processes posted for customers (and others), instructing them where and how to report instances of service abuse. Service Providers, Network Operators, and Equipment Suppliers should support the email IDs listed in rfc 2142 “MAILBOX NAMES FOR COMMON SERVICES, ROLES AND FUNCTIONS.” |
| 13-8-8072 | Network Operators and Service Providers should maintain and update IDS/IPS tools regularly to detect current threats, exploits, and vulnerabilities. |
| 13-8-8090 | Network Operators, Service Providers, and Equipment Suppliers should restrict dynamic port allocation protocols such as Remote Procedure Calls (RPC) and some classes of Voice-over-IP protocols (among others) from usage, especially on mission critical assets, to prevent host vulnerabilities to code execution. Dynamic port allocation protocols should not be exposed to the internet. If used, such protocols should be protected via a dynamic port knowledgeable filtering firewall or other similar network protection methodology. |
Download matching Best Practices
Next results